
Wear Particle Atlas CD-
Product Brochure
"Database of wear and contaminant particles in used lubricants."
Introduction
The Wear Particle Atlas CD-
The Wear Particle Atlas CD-
Wear Particle Atlas CD-
Part 1, Picture Guide
The Picture Guide is one of four main features of the Wear Particle Atlas CD-
When Atlas is first started, the Home Page as shown on the right appears. On this
page there are 8 wear particle images which are representative of 8 sub-

By clicking each image, the corresponding sub-

The sub-

Part 2, Wear Severity Classification
The Wear Severity Classification feature is one of four parts of the Wear Particle
Atlas CD-

Example of Cutting Wear Severity Index
To be objective in its differentiation, the Atlas first defines the "key features"
for each severity level. This is the quantitative, measurable criterion based on
the size distributions and wear-
The quantitative features of this sample meet the criteria for Level 6 of the fatigue wear severity. Further, the features of the wear particles of this sample are equivalent or similar to those of the examples (cases) in the Atlas. Therefore, the wear severity level of this oil sample can be differentiated as 6.
As can be seen from the example below, the criteria of fatigue wear severity level 6 is:

Example of Fatigue Wear, Severity Level 6
This differentiated Level 6 is a universal wear severity level. It can be defined as a "normal", or an "abnormal" or even a catastrophic condition. The determination depends on the criticality, operational environment, and expected life of the machine from which the particles came. For example, if this sample came from a large slow rolling bearing, this severity level 6 may be defined as a "mildly abnormal" wear condition. However, if this sample came from a critical gear system, this Level 6 maybe specified as an "unacceptable" or even a "severe" condition. It is from this perspective that the wear severity differentiation in the Atlas provides an approximate yardstick for measuring machine severity. This enables an activity, which currently is subjective, to be quantitative and standard.
Part 3, Cotamination Level and ISO Cleanliness
The Contamination Level and ISO Cleanliness feature is one of four main features
of the Wear Particle Atlas CD-
Contamination Levels and Corresponding ISO Cleanliness
Contamination Level ISO Cleanliness
Level 1 ISO 13/10
Level 2 ISO 15/12
Level 3 ISO 16/13
Level 4 ISO 17/14
Level 5 ISO 18/15
Level 6 ISO 19/16
Level 7 ISO 20/17
Level 8 ISO 21/18
Level 9 ISO 22/10
Level 10 ISO 24/21

Each level contains 4 representative solid particle images grabbed from different
areas of the filtergram with varied magnifications. This component can be used to
correlate machine wear with lubricant dust contamination and to estimate the contamination
levels of some very dirty, very viscous, or water-
Part 4, Integration of Ferrogram and Filtergram Methods
The Integration of Ferrogram and Filtergram Methods feature is one off our main features
of the Wear Particle Atlas. The ferrogram method is excellent in identifying the
materials and the size and shape of solid particles, but is deficient in collecting
nonferrous particles. The filtergram method collects all solid particles larger than
the pore size of filter paper, but is restricted in identifying materials of solid
particles. The Wear Particle Atlas CD-
Figure (a) below shows an easy identifiable, nonferrous (lead/tin alloy) wear particle image on a ferrogram. Their non magnetic deposition pattern makes the discrimination of the lead/tin particles from the ferrous particles easy. These nonferrous particles are difficult to identify on the filtergram. In this case, the color and brightness of both ferrous and lead/tin alloy particles are very similar, see figure (b), due to lack of the deposition features in orientation and locations as on a ferrogram, figure (a).
(a) Lead/tin particle on ferrogram

(b) Lead/tin particle on filtergram
The filtergram method is, however, able to collect nonferrous metal particles with high efficiency. This capability contributes to its high reliability to detect the condition of nonferrous components. Figure (c) shows the massive rubbing copper wear particles on a filtergram from a worm gearbox, revealing a high wear rate of the copper worm gear. But the ferrogram, made of same volume of sample, shows a very low copper particle concentration, as shown in figure (d). It is estimated that the collecting efficiency of the ferrogram method for small copper particles is likely to be less than 10% in this case.

(c) Copper particles on filtergram

(d) Copper particles on ferrogram
Thank you for visiting the "Integration of Ferrogram and Filtergram Methods" feature
of the Wear Particle Atlas CD-
Please Click for a PDF file.
Copyright ® 2007 Particle Test Pty Ltd